![]() In fact I think it's the best piece of FOSS creativity software produced to date and I actually much prefer it over its proprietary rivals. I assume you're using Blender for 3D modelling? Blender is great. ![]() It's rough around the edges, without a doubt, but it's a good piece of software. The more time I spend in Inkscape the more I like it though, once you learn the key combos and stuff the UI is largely irrelevant anyway. To be fair, again, Illustrator has a pretty awful UI as well, I think with programs of this complexity it's just hard to do good UIs (although Freehand was lovely to use. Inkscape is kinda the opposite of The Gimp in that it's incredibly powerful - it can do anything - but it has a pretty bad UI, everything is just kinda dumped on the screen on the same level. It's pretty promising already and seems to see far more rapid development than The Gimp. If what you're doing is more along the lines of image creation than photo manipulation then you might be better off with Krita. Particularly the non-destructive editing stuff. While the Gimp's UI might be alright, it's definitely lacking in features for advanced use. I actually think The Gimp has a better UI than PS but it's frustrating having to learn a new tool to do stuff you can already do. But I knew them, so there's a lot of familiarity to get over and muscle memory to unlearn and relearn. ![]() ![]() I never particularly liked Photoshop, I don't think it has a particularly good UI, same for Illustrator. So just practice around and let the flow work itself way out.” It can be quite intimidating, but once your know your way around it. But like any other software, empty your head and explore it first. Now that leaves us with GIMP - Is it good? Yes. I've used it a lot and its pretty awesome as well. If you're into vectors - inkscape is all you need. His fellow Linux redditors responded with their thoughts:īull500: ”Well if you're into painting, i would recommend Krita.There is no limits to what its capable of now and into the future. I'm fine with the rest of the software stack on linux for my needs, the only issue is Photoshop, I'll be using gimp for texture editing and general graphic design stuff. Now I have used gimp a few times, I've edited photos fixed things up, I just havent spent a massive amount of time on it and used it in production.īit of a background, I'm a 3D artist. So my question is has anyone one switch fully over from photoshop to Gimp and inkscape? How was the transition, do you feel limited, any other comments or thoughts. my Mac died a few months ago and I'm looking at going full linux for a desktop workstation. Comment below if you think that we’ve missed something or if you have any other suggestions.I'm looking at getting a new home computer. We hope you found this article useful and informative. In the same vein, you can use Photoshop’s brushes in GIMP. Another major reason why you would use GIMP is if you are on a Linux OS.įinally, they are highly compatible: with GIMP you can save your work in the PSD format and open it to work on it in Photoshop. In addition to that, if you’re a hobbyist, GIMP is a wise choice for you to design your graphics. Since it’s free with amazing capabilities. However, for small businesses that are on budget, GIMP is a better option. Professionals use both software for different purposes. ![]() Conclusion: winner of the GIMP vs Photoshop face-off The full Creative Cloud subscription will cost you around $53. You can also purchase it within the Creative Cloud subscription for roughly $20. On the other hand, to get Photoshop as a life-time purchase, you have to pay up to $700. GIMP is free of cost with no license required, besides having all GIMP upgrades free as well. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |